Allianz für den Rechtsstaat
| Allianz für den Rechtsstaat | |
|---|---|
| founded in the year | 1996 |
| City | Berlin |
| Country | Germany |
| Website | http://www.derrechtsstaat.de/ |
| Legal form | e.V. |
| address | Zionskirchstr. 3, 10119 Berlin |
| founder | Beatrix von Storch, Sven von Storch |
| type of institution | lobby group |
| Virtual Networks A "Virtual Network" is a group of Think Tanks identified by certain semantic and normative (ideological) commonalities (e.g. climate change scepticism). Such a virtual network constitutes a research field that differs from the study of formal networks. Formal networks are real in the sense of officially acknowledged and immediately open to empirical validation. Virtual networks on the other hand display shared ideas. Social network analysis tools can be applied to find out if or to what extent virtual networks are real networks that display linkages (membership in networks, personnel, resources etc.). Unconnected think tanks in turn can be considered special cases in need of explanation independent from network structures (unless we have to assume invisible, hidden or covered ties). | Neue Rechte |
| Last revision | 29.05.2017 |
The following coordinate was not recognized: 52.535763;13.400959.The following coordinate was not recognized: 52.535763;13.400959. The organisation was founded as 'Verein Göttinger Kreis – Studenten für den Rechtsstaat e. V.'. The main objective was to compensate those who lost property and wealth in East Germany after the occupation and land reforms of the Soviet Forces after the end of WWII.
Organizational Structure and Funding
Address
Zionskirchstr. 3, 10119 Berlin
People
Executive board
People leading the Think Tank in the day to day business (CEOs, directorates etc.).
- Sven von Storch (1996-)
- Beatrix von Storch (1996-)
Cooperations with Non-Think Tanks
Topics
We used the DGs of the EU to generate a basic list of topics. This list is going to be steadily extended. However we try to preserve a persistent list of topics.
Notes
This section is used to note presumptions that need further investigation, as well as things that don't fit into other sections.
It is not clear whether the group is still active. The last entry dates back to 2013, but the website is still live.
References