Difference between revisions of "Joze Pucnik Institute"

From wiki_ttni_en
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (no summary specified)
m (no summary specified)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Anzahl MitarbeiterInnen=
 
|Anzahl MitarbeiterInnen=
 
|Kooperiert mit=
 
|Kooperiert mit=
|Topics=Europäische/r Integration/sprozess;Political Movements, Parties, Thought
+
|Topics=European Integration;Political Movements, Parties, Thought
 
|Ist_Vorstand=Šuštar, Nataša;Igor Marinšek;Avbelj, Matej;Ban, Vera;Strah, Robert;Turk, Žiga
 
|Ist_Vorstand=Šuštar, Nataša;Igor Marinšek;Avbelj, Matej;Ban, Vera;Strah, Robert;Turk, Žiga
 
|automatische Einleitung (J/N)=J
 
|automatische Einleitung (J/N)=J
Line 80: Line 80:
 
* Informationsgesellschaft und Medien
 
* Informationsgesellschaft und Medien
 
* Institutional Reform/Public Services
 
* Institutional Reform/Public Services
* Justiz und Grundrechte
+
* Justice and fundamental rights
 
* Enterprise and Industry
 
* Enterprise and Industry
 
* Verkehr
 
* Verkehr
 
* Competition
 
* Competition
 
* Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
 
* Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
* Energie
+
* Energy
 
* Entwicklung
 
* Entwicklung
* <b>! [[Topics::Europäische/r Integration/sprozess]]</b>
+
* <b>! [[Topics::European Integration]]</b>
* Erziehung/Bildung/Kinder und Jugend
+
* Education, Culture, Multilingualism and Youth
 
* Financial Programming and the Budget
 
* Financial Programming and the Budget
 
* Maritime affairs and fisheries/Agriculture and rural development
 
* Maritime affairs and fisheries/Agriculture and rural development
 
* Forschung und Innovation
 
* Forschung und Innovation
* Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz
+
* Health and Consumer Policy
 
* International Trade/Globalization
 
* International Trade/Globalization
 
* Inneres
 
* Inneres

Revision as of 17:38, 19 November 2012

Joze Pucnik Institute
City Ljubljana
Country Slowenien
Website http://www.ijpucnik.si
address Hribarjevo nabrežje 13, 1000, Ljubljana
Networks parteipolitische EU-Think Tank-Netzwerke, Stockholm Network, EIN-Netzwerk
Last revision 19.11.2012
Output of Joze Pucnik Institute 2024
<pbars ymin=0 ytitle="count" xtitle="Kind of Output" angle=90 colors=80B3E6 size=330x250>

Books, Peer reviewed pubs., Studies, Articles, Policy papers, Op-eds, Newspaper articles, Blogs, Periodicals, Podcasts (audio), Podcasts (video), Conferences, Seminars/workshops, Lecturers/talks, Briefings, Others, </pbars>

The following coordinate was not recognized: 46.049668;14.505241.The following coordinate was not recognized: 46.049668;14.505241.


Organizational Structure and Funding

Address

Hribarjevo nabrežje 13, 1000, Ljubljana

People

Executive board

People leading the Think Tank in the day to day business (CEOs, directorates etc.).


Advisory board

People advising the Think Tank (mainly in scientific questions)

Supervisory board

People supervising the Think Tank (mainly in economic questions).






Topics

We used the DGs of the EU to generate a basic list of topics. This list is going to be steadily extended. However we try to preserve a persistent list of topics.

  • European Integration
  • Political Movements, Parties, Thought

Semantic Fields

What we call here a semantic field is the idea to categorize think tanks in a two level system. The first levels are so called 'Virtual Networks' and the second are the semantic fields. Accordingly every semantic field entered here has to be attached to a virtual network. If you would like to follow a special phenomenon among think tanks please contact us and we are going to add a new virtual network. Semantic fields are topics that promote a virtual network. Lets take climate change as an example: 'climate change skeptics' is the virtual network and 'adaption instead of mitigation' would be one possible semantic field.

  • Reduction of public expenditures (Austerity Politics): Public debt crisis should not been overcome by higher taxes but reduced public expenditures[1]


References

  1. Problem Slovenije niso prenizki davki ampak previsoka javna poraba! (Slovenia's problem are not too low taxes but excessive public spending)